Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assembly of parts supplied by others at the appellant's premises amounted to manufacture of excisable goods, and whether the finding of liability and the consequential penalty and fine called for interference.
Analysis: The assembly of different parts was treated as manufacture because it resulted in a new product, namely refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances falling under Central Excise Tariff Item No. 29A. The fact that the parts were supplied by others, or that the appellant did not possess a press machine for making cabinets, was held to be immaterial. The penalty and redemption fine were also found to be reasonable in the circumstances.
Conclusion: The appellant was held to be a manufacturer of the subject goods, and the order imposing penalty and redemption fine was upheld.