Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal could be heard and disposed of by a single Member of the Appellate Tribunal under Section 81B of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968.
Analysis: Section 81B permits disposal by a single Member only in cases where the value of the confiscated goods, or the amount of fine or penalty involved, does not exceed the prescribed limit. The matter before the Tribunal concerned the appellant's entitlement to a gold dealer's licence and did not fall within the class of cases covered by that provision. As jurisdiction flows from statute, an order made without the requisite jurisdiction would be without legal effect. The matter therefore required consideration by a duly constituted two-member Bench.
Conclusion: The single Member had no jurisdiction to decide the appeal; the case was transferred to a two-member Bench.
Ratio Decidendi: A single Member of the Appellate Tribunal can act only within the limited statutory jurisdiction conferred by the governing provision, and any disposal beyond that jurisdiction is a nullity.