Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of goods cleared for home consumption and later returned by customers could be excluded while computing the aggregate clearances for eligibility under the exemption notification.
Analysis: The notification granted exemption only where the aggregate value of specified goods cleared for home consumption during the relevant period did not exceed the prescribed limit. Goods cleared after observance of the prescribed procedure and payment of duty were treated as having been taken into consumption. The scheme of the notification did not provide for exclusion of returned goods, save for the exclusions expressly indicated, and the fact that goods were later returned and duty was refunded under the rules did not alter their character as clearances for home consumption. Even on the appellant's own case, exclusion of the returned goods for the relevant period would not bring the aggregate below the prescribed limit.
Conclusion: The value of returned goods was not deductible from the aggregate value of clearances for home consumption, and the assessee was not entitled to the exemption.
Ratio Decidendi: For purposes of an exemption notification based on aggregate clearances for home consumption, goods lawfully cleared on payment of duty remain includible in the turnover computation even if they are subsequently returned by customers, unless the notification expressly provides otherwise.