Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether fuse links were classifiable under Item 23A of the Central Excise Tariff for the purpose of additional duty and countervailing duty.
Analysis: The goods were treated as glass-based fuse links, and the rejection of refund rested on the view that they were glassware. The Tribunal held that if the goods were not glassware, they could not be treated as glass for levy under Item 23A, and the material on record did not support the departmental classification adopted for additional duty.
Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable under Item 23A of the Central Excise Tariff for purposes of additional duty, and the assessee was entitled to consequential relief.