Statutory gratuity contribution deduction cannot be denied solely for lack of actuarial valuation where the liability is legally governed.

Gratuity contribution claimed as deduction cannot be disallowed merely because it lacks actuarial valuation where the liability is governed by a statutory scheme and paid to an approved gratuity trust. The relevant question is whether the payment represents a statutory gratuity obligation under the applicable agricultural income-tax framework and the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; actuarial valuation is relevant only when no statutory basis governs the liability. Because the revisional authority did not examine that statutory basis, the disallowance was not sustainable on the sole ground of absence of actuarial valuation and the matter was remitted for reconsideration.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee's claim for deduction towards gratuity contribution required support by actuarial valuation, and whether the claim was allowable as a statutory gratuity payment under the relevant agricultural income-tax law.

Analysis: The claim was treated by the authorities as a provision for gratuity and disallowed solely because it was not supported by actuarial valuation of the liability for each year. The assessee's case was that the amount was not a mere provision but actual contribution to an approved gratuity trust towards a statutory liability governed by the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and that the agricultural income-tax provisions permitted deduction of gratuity paid in accordance with law. Where gratuity is regulated by statute, the liability is to be worked out under that statute, and resort to actuarial valuation becomes relevant only where no statutory framework governs the payment. This aspect was not considered by the revisional authority.

Conclusion: The disallowance could not be sustained on the sole ground of absence of actuarial valuation, and the matter required fresh consideration by the Deputy Commissioner.

Final Conclusion: The assessment orders disallowing the gratuity claim were set aside and the proceedings were remitted for reconsideration in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: Where gratuity liability is governed by a statutory scheme and the claim is for contribution to an approved gratuity trust, disallowance cannot rest merely on the absence of actuarial valuation without examining the statutory basis of the liability.

---