TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court emphasizes proper assessment order before remitting service tax to agencies</h1> <h3>Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited Versus Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, Rajahmundry</h3> Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited Versus Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, Rajahmundry - [2012] 48 VST 558 (AP) Issues:1. Assessment of service tax liability on the petitioners.2. Validity of the notice issued under section 87 of the Finance Act, 1994.3. Liability of the principal employer to remit service tax amount.Analysis:1. The judgment involves two writ petitions, one filed by the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited and the other by manpower supply agencies of the same corporation. The Deputy Commissioner of Customs issued a notice directing the corporation to remit a service tax amount for a specific period. The petitioners contested the requirement to pay service tax to the manpower supply agencies without a proper assessment order. The court emphasized that the assessing authority must assess the liability of the agencies first before directing the principal employer to remit the amount. The court directed the respondent to assess the liability of the societies mentioned in the notice and provide them with a fair opportunity to present their case.2. The court acknowledged the argument that without an assessment order, there could be potential friction between the manpower suppliers and the principal employer, affecting business operations. The Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited assured that it could transmit the tax liability once an assessment order is issued. The court allowed the writ petitions on the grounds that the notice was issued without a preceding assessment order. It granted the respondent a maximum of three months to pass an assessment order. The judgment highlighted the importance of following due process before directing payment.3. The judgment clarified that the liability to pay the service tax amount arises only after a proper assessment by the authority. It emphasized that the principal employer should not be directed to remit the amount until the liability of the agencies is determined through assessment. The court's decision aimed to ensure a fair and lawful process in assessing and collecting service tax, preventing any undue burden on the principal employer without a valid assessment order in place.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
