Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods described as special gold alloy plating salts were classifiable as an alloy of gold under Chapter 71 or as plating salts falling under Chapter 28 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: The classification had to be determined on the material on record. The invoice described all the items as special gold alloy plating salts, and no evidence was produced to displace that description. The revenue also failed to adduce evidence to establish that the goods were alloys of gold within the meaning of Note 4(b) of Chapter 71. In the absence of contrary proof, the goods were accepted as plating salts, i.e. chemicals, and Chapter Note 2(vi) of Chapter 28 applied to compounds of precious metals. Since the goods did not answer any specific sub-heading within Heading 28.01/58, they fell under the residuary sub-heading (1) of that heading.
Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable under Heading 71.05/11(1) and were correctly classifiable under sub-heading (1) of Heading 28.01/58, with consequential reassessment of duty in favour of the assessee.