Plastic classification for nylon products confirmed under the tariff, with exemption available once the duty condition was satisfied.

Articles manufactured from polyamide nylon-6 and polyethylene were treated as articles of plastics under Item 15A(2) of the Central Excise Tariff, because Item 15A covered plastics including the relevant synthetic resins and polyamides. On that basis, nylon rods, tubings, fishing line and garstrap were not shifted to the residuary Item 68 merely because they were shaped industrial goods. Once the goods were accepted as falling under Item 15A and the relevant additional duty condition on the raw material was met, the exemption under Notifications No. 68/71-C.E. and 61/71-C.E. was available, leading to consequential duty relief and refund.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether nylon rods, nylon tubings, nylon fishing line and garstrap manufactured from polyamide nylon-6 or polyethylene were classifiable as articles of plastics under Item 15A(2) of the Central Excise Tariff or as residuary goods under Item 68. (ii) Whether the goods were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 68/71-C.E. dated 29-5-1971 and Notification No. 61/71-C.E. dated 29-5-1971 on the basis of their classification under Item 15A.

Issue (i): Whether nylon rods, nylon tubings, nylon fishing line and garstrap manufactured from polyamide nylon-6 or polyethylene were classifiable as articles of plastics under Item 15A(2) of the Central Excise Tariff or as residuary goods under Item 68.

Analysis: The classification turned on the nature of the raw material and the scope of Item 15A. The record showed that the impugned goods were manufactured from polyamide type nylon-6, and garstrap was made from polyethylene. Item 15A defined plastics to include the artificial or synthetic resins or plastic materials covered by sub-item (1), and polyamides fell within that description. On the evidence relied upon, the finished products were articles made of plastics and not goods falling in the residuary entry.

Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Item 15A(2) and not under Item 68, in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the goods were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 68/71-C.E. dated 29-5-1971 and Notification No. 61/71-C.E. dated 29-5-1971 on the basis of their classification under Item 15A.

Analysis: Once the goods were held to fall under Item 15A and the appellants were shown to pay additional duty of customs on the relevant raw material under Item 15A(1), the conditions for the claimed exemption were satisfied. The exemption flowed from the accepted classification of the goods as plastic articles under the tariff item.

Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to exemption under the notifications, in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded, the goods were held to be plastic articles within the tariff entry claimed by the appellants, and the consequential refund and duty relief followed.

Ratio Decidendi: Articles manufactured from polyamide-based nylon-6 or similar plastic material fall within the plastics entry where the tariff definition of plastics includes the relevant synthetic resin, and they cannot be shifted to the residuary entry merely because they are shaped industrial products.

---