Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in respect of seized excisable goods cleared on payment of duty after seizure, the duty was payable at the rate prevailing on the date of seizure or at the rate in force on the date of payment.
Analysis: Rule 9A(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 governs the applicable rate in such cases and provides that the duty shall be charged at the rate in force on the date on which the duty is paid. The earlier seizure date does not determine the rate where the rule expressly links liability to the date of payment. The notification relied on by the appellant was consistent with this position.
Conclusion: The duty was payable at the rate in force on the date of payment. The issue is decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeds and the demand based on the earlier rate cannot stand.
Ratio Decidendi: Where Rule 9A(5) applies, the relevant rate of central excise duty is the rate prevailing on the date of payment of duty, not the date of seizure.