Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in rejecting the Revenue's application for reference under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the question relating to deduction under section 80-O arose as a question of law.
Analysis: The approval granted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes under section 80-O required the deductible income to be computed after accounting for expenses incurred in earning that income, that is, on the basis of net income. The authorities below had recorded a factual finding that the assessee had not disclosed the relevant expenditure, and the Tribunal did not reverse that finding. In that situation, the proposed question was one of law arising from the Tribunal's order, and the Department's application for reference could not have been refused.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was not justified in rejecting the Department's application under section 256, and the reference was directed to be drawn up on the question proposed by the Revenue.