Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether stainless steel fan hooks manufactured from stainless steel rods fall within entry 43, sub-entries (21) or (22), of the Third Schedule to the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. (ii) Whether the clarification issued under section 94 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act could be treated as applicable only prospectively and whether interest was liable to be waived.
Issue (i): Whether stainless steel fan hooks manufactured from stainless steel rods fall within entry 43, sub-entries (21) or (22), of the Third Schedule to the Kerala Value Added Tax Act.
Analysis: The product was found to be a simple article made by cutting and bending stainless steel rods into a U-shape for fixing fans to the roof slab. The entries relied upon covered bars and rods of stainless steel and other bars and rods or angles, shapes and sections of stainless steel obtained in the manufacturing process such as hot-rolling, hot drawing or extrusion, and not articles further worked for a specific use. Since the fan hooks were manufactured from the raw material by cutting and shaping for a distinct purpose, they did not answer the description in either sub-entry.
Conclusion: The product does not fall under entry 43, sub-entries (21) or (22), and is taxable at 12.5 per cent under section 6(1)(d) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act.
Issue (ii): Whether the clarification issued under section 94 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act could be treated as applicable only prospectively and whether interest was liable to be waived.
Analysis: The clarification was issued pursuant to the statutory mechanism under section 94, and the later amendment removing the proviso relating to prospective effect of clarification was noticed. In that context, the plea that the clarification operated only prospectively was rejected. At the same time, limited relief was granted by directing waiver of interest if the arrears were cleared within the stipulated period.
Conclusion: The clarification is not confined to prospective operation, though interest stands waived on compliance with the conditions directed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned clarification was upheld and the assessee's challenge failed on classification, with only limited consequential relief in respect of interest.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods obtained by further working raw stainless steel rods into a specific finished article for a distinct use do not fall within tariff entries covering bars, rods, angles, shapes or sections of stainless steel obtained in the manufacturing process.