Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether fan covers and terminal boxes manufactured and supplied for use in monoblock pump sets below 10 horse power were taxable under Entry 89 of the First Schedule or under Entry 7, Part IV of the Second Schedule to the Madhya Pradesh Vanijya Kar Adhiniyam, 1994.
Analysis: The disputed items were found to be accessories. The decisive question was whether they were accessories of the electric motor or of the monoblock pump set. The motor was held to be an integral and inseparable part of the monoblock pump set, with no separate independent existence in that context. Since the items were specially manufactured for use in monoblock pump sets and contributed to their protection, convenience, and safety, they were treated as accessories of the pump set itself. A specific entry dealing with pumping sets and their accessories was held to govern the classification, and the general entry for machines worked by electricity and their parts and accessories could not apply.
Conclusion: The items were covered by Entry 89 of the First Schedule and not by Entry 7, Part IV of the Second Schedule. The classification made by the Commissioner was set aside and the writ petition was allowed.