Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was validly served on the assessee so as to start limitation for filing the appeal under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and whether the rejection of the appeal as time-barred was sustainable.
Analysis: The appeal period under section 31 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 could be invoked only from the date of proper service of the assessment order. Under rule 52(1) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959, service by tendering the order requires an endorsement by the person delivering the notice or order, and such endorsement constitutes proof of service. The acknowledgment on record did not contain the name or designation of the recipient, did not bear the seal of the assessee, and there was no endorsement by the serving officer. In the absence of proper proof of service, the date of service could not be treated as the date on which the department claimed service had been effected.
Conclusion: The order rejecting the appeal as time-barred was unsustainable. The court held that the assessment order must be treated as served on 18 November 2004, the delay in filing the appeal stood condoned, and the appeal was to be heard on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute makes endorsement by the serving officer the proof of service, an acknowledgment lacking such endorsement and other reliable indicia of receipt cannot establish valid service for computing limitation.