Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sale of pulses in inter-State transactions was exempt from Central sales tax in the absence of forms C or F, where the goods were found to be tax-paid goods under the relevant notification.
Analysis: The notification governing pulses provided exemption where the selling dealer proved that tax on such goods had been paid under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, or where the prescribed declaration form obtained from the dealer from whom the goods were purchased was furnished up to the time of assessment. The Tribunal recorded a finding of fact that the pulses sold in inter-State sale were tax-paid goods in Uttar Pradesh. On that factual finding, and in view of the applicable notifications, the absence of forms C or F did not make the sale taxable.
Conclusion: The exemption was available and the Tribunal's order suffered from no illegality.
Final Conclusion: The revision failed because the statutory notification protected sales of tax-paid pulses, and the Tribunal's factual finding brought the case within that exemption.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the applicable notification grants exemption to pulses if tax-paid status is proved, a factual finding that the goods were tax-paid is sufficient to sustain exemption notwithstanding non-production of forms C or F.