Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 43(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 could be sustained in the absence of a categorical finding of mens rea or guilty intention on the part of the assessee.
Analysis: Penalty under the sales tax statute cannot be imposed mechanically. A finding on facts is required showing malice, contumacious conduct, or deliberate concealment of material facts, or some act aimed at avoiding tax legally due. Here, the Tribunal had recorded that the assessee had filed the return and disclosed the true turnover, which was accepted for determining tax liability, and that no mens rea was found. In such circumstances, the penalty provision was not attracted.
Conclusion: The question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue, and the deletion of penalty was upheld.