Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the second proviso to section 5(1)(v) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, which makes a registered dealer liable to pay tax on Fifth Schedule goods irrespective of turnover, is invalid as discriminatory and inconsistent with the general turnover threshold under section 5(1).
Analysis: Section 5(1) is the general charging provision, but the statutory scheme for Fifth Schedule goods is a special one under section 5(1)(v). The second proviso expressly subjects a registered dealer effecting the last sale of such goods to tax at the prescribed rate irrespective of turnover. Registered dealers and unregistered dealers do not form the same class for the purposes of the Act, because the Act attaches different privileges and obligations to registration, including the right to collect tax and obtain statutory forms. The grouping of goods in the Fifth Schedule and the fixation of a special point and rate of levy fall within legislative policy in taxation, and the court will not substitute its own view merely because the burden differs from that applicable to other goods or to unregistered dealers.
Conclusion: The challenge to the second proviso to section 5(1)(v) failed, and the revised assessments and appellate order were upheld in favour of the Revenue.