Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was leviable on Central sales tax where the dealer claimed concessional rate on the basis of form C but failed to furnish the requisite forms in time.
Analysis: Section 8 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 makes the tax admittedly payable by the dealer payable within the prescribed period and provides for simple interest on default. The expression tax admittedly payable includes tax disclosed in the return or accounts, and where concessional or nil rate treatment depends on compliance with statutory conditions, including production of prescribed forms, failure to produce those forms means the dealer remains liable at the normal rate. On the authorities considered, where a dealer does not satisfy the statutory requirement for concession, the unpaid amount becomes part of the admitted liability and interest runs from the due date prescribed under section 8(1). A claim of bona fide difficulty in obtaining form C does not displace the statutory liability to interest in such a case.
Conclusion: Interest was rightly chargeable on the unpaid Central sales tax, and the dealer's challenge to such liability failed.
Final Conclusion: The revisional court affirmed that non-furnishing of the requisite declaration forms defeated the claim to concessional taxation and attracted statutory interest on the unpaid tax liability.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a dealer claims concessional tax treatment subject to filing prescribed forms but fails to furnish them, the tax is treated as payable at the normal rate and interest under section 8(1) accrues on the unpaid admitted tax from the prescribed due date.