TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2005 (7) TMI 631
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... would be filing the requisite form C subsequently. It failed to submit form C in respect of sale of Rs. 21,18,846.32, at the assessment stage. Subsequently, certain forms were filed before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) and the benefit of those forms were extended to it. It is an admitted fact that the dealer-opposite party could not file the requisite number of form C as stated in the returns. Resultantly for certain sales in respect of which the dealer-opposite party initially claimed concessional rate of tax, could not produce form C, consequently tax at the rate of 10 per cent was ultimately levied by the first appellate authority. The dealer-opposite party filed second appeal before the Tribunal and disputed its liability to pay in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....deposit the tax admittedly payable by it within the prescribed period, he shall be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of two per cent per mensem and pay the amount with effect from the date immediately following the last date prescribed till the date of payment of such amount under sub-section (1) of section 8 of the Act. The Explanation attached to section 8(1) of the Act defines the expression "tax admittedly payable". It means the tax which is payable under the Act on the turnover of sales or, as the case may be, the turnover of purchases, or of both, as disclosed in the accounts maintained by the dealer, or admitted by him in any return or proceedings under the Act, whichever is later. Under the Act certain forms have been pre....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s being exempt under section 3D(1) the petitioner did not commit any error in determining the tax payable to be nil under section 8(1). Therefore its failure to file form could result in the enhancement of 'tax in excess' but the assessing authority could not while assessing tax create any demand for interest. Reliance was placed on Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Vinus Auto Traders [1980] UPTC 273. None of the submissions has any merit on it. We have already indicated above that liability to pay interest under sub-section (1) of section 8 is not affected by deposit of tax assessed within the time specified. The only question, therefore, is whether the calculation of tax payable was in accordance with the Act. It is not disputed that i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s Research and Supply Company [1982] UPTC 804, is directly on the controversy involved in the present case. This court has considered section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 along with section 8 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, as amended by U.P. Act No. 38 of 1975 and has held that where a dealer is seeking exemption from levy of tax upon some part of the turnover, unless he fulfils the statutory requirement for such a claim he shall have to pay interest upon the unpaid amount of tax calculated on the turnover worked out without regard to claim of exemption. In this case the High Court disapproved the view of the Tribunal that interest for non-filing of form "C" on the unpaid amount would be payable from the date of assessment. The reason i....