Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether condition No. 21 of the tender barred the contractor from collecting sales tax on bajri from registered dealers dealing in building materials and, on a proper construction of the contract, whether the petitioner was entitled to collect such tax.
Analysis: The registration certificates showed that the dealers were registered for dealing in stones, marbles, granites, cement, cement wares, building materials and similar goods. Bajri was treated by the department as a building material, and the notification dated 9 September 1971 was relied on only to show that building material included bajri. On that basis, the reference in condition No. 21 to registered dealers dealing in the mineral was not confined to dealers exclusively dealing in bajri. The contractual clause therefore prohibited collection of tax from registered dealers of building materials in the auctioned area, and the petitioner could not avoid the contractual terms after accepting the contract.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to collect sales tax from the registered dealers concerned, and the challenge to the notice, communication and Tribunal order failed.