Maintainability of challenge after release on security: proviso to trade tax seizure provision cannot be invoked once goods are released.

A challenge under the proviso to section 13-A(6) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was not maintainable once the seized goods had been released after the dealer furnished the security demanded for their release. The proviso operated only while the goods remained under seizure and the seizing authority was determining the nature or quantum of security; after compliance and release, no live issue survived for adjudication under that proviso. The Court also noted that seizure proceedings and penalty proceedings are distinct, so observations in the seizure stage do not determine the penalty matter. The Tribunal's contrary order was set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether a representation or appeal under the proviso to section 13-A(6) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 remained maintainable after the seized goods had already been released on furnishing the demanded security.

Analysis: The goods had been detained and released only after the dealer deposited the security demanded for their release. The proviso to section 13-A(6) permits relaxation while the goods remain under seizure and the seizing authority is considering the quantum or nature of security to be furnished. Once the dealer complied with the demand, obtained release, and did not seek the proviso before release, there was nothing surviving for adjudication under that proviso. The Court also noted that seizure proceedings and penalty proceedings are distinct, and observations in seizure proceedings do not conclude the penalty matter.

Conclusion: The challenge under the proviso to section 13-A(6) was not maintainable after release of the goods on furnishing security, and the Tribunal's contrary order was set aside.

---