Speaking order requirement in interim tax relief, with the stay order set aside for fresh hearing and reconsideration.

A tribunal's order on interim stay in tax recovery proceedings must be a reasoned speaking order, based on the relevant facts and after hearing the affected party. The non-speaking grant of only partial stay was held unsustainable because it was made in a routine manner without proper consideration of the record or the balance of convenience. The order was set aside and the stay application was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal's non-speaking order granting partial stay, without considering the full facts and circumstances and without passing a reasoned order, could be sustained.

Analysis: The order under challenge concerned interim stay in tax recovery proceedings. The revisionist complained that the Tribunal granted only limited stay by a non-speaking order, although the dispute involved allegations of misuse of statutory forms and the balance of convenience required a proper examination of the record. The order was found to have been made in a routine manner without a speaking consideration of the merits and without affording a proper hearing before deciding the extent of stay.

Conclusion: The non-speaking order was set aside and the Tribunal was directed to pass a fresh speaking order after hearing the revisionist.

Final Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration of the stay application in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: An order affecting interim relief in tax proceedings must be a reasoned speaking order passed after considering the relevant facts and after giving the affected party an opportunity of hearing.

---