Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Notification No. F.5(19) FD/CT/68-5 dated 8 March 1968 cancelled the earlier Notification No. F.5(25) FD/CT/66-VII dated 16 March 1966 in its entirety or only to the extent that the earlier notification granted exemption under section 4(2) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954.
Analysis: The earlier notification of 16 March 1966 was treated as comprising two distinct parts: one issued under section 4(2) exempting specified precious and semi-precious stones from tax on conditions, and another issued under rule 15 read with section 5 fixing the point of taxation for the relevant goods at the last point in the series of sales by successive dealers. The notification of 8 March 1968 was issued only under section 4(2). Since section 4(2) confers power to grant or withdraw exemption, but does not empower the State Government to alter the single point of taxation fixed under rule 15 read with section 5, the later notification could cancel only the exemption part of the earlier notification. It could not affect the separate notification fixing the last point of taxation.
Conclusion: The later notification cancelled only the first part of the notification dated 16 March 1966, and not the part fixing the last point of taxation.
Ratio Decidendi: A notification issued solely under the exemption power cannot alter or withdraw a separately issued notification fixing the point of taxation under the rule-making power.