Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed for alleged irregular transportation of notified goods was liable to be reduced to a token amount.
Analysis: The application challenged the penalty confirmed by the authorities below. The explanation for the delay in obtaining and producing the transport permit was accepted, and the Tribunal found that the circumstances justified interference with the quantum of penalty. In view of the explanation offered, a nominal penalty was considered sufficient to meet the ends of justice.
Conclusion: The penalty was reduced to Rs. 5,000, with refund of any excess amount already paid and liberty to recover only the reduced amount according to law.
Final Conclusion: The applicant obtained substantial relief by way of reduction of the penalty to a token amount.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the explanation for the breach is accepted, the quantum of penalty may be reduced to a token amount if that is sufficient to meet the ends of justice.