Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed transactions constituted inter-State sales liable to tax, on the footing that the goods were directly despatched from the head office to buyers outside the State or were delivered directly to buyers without being unloaded at the depots.
Analysis: A sale falls within inter-State trade when the movement of goods from one State to another is occasioned by the contract of sale or is an incident of that contract. The decisive test is not where property in the goods passes, but whether the sale occasions the movement of goods across State borders. On the facts found, the goods were directly despatched to the buyers, were not unloaded at the depots in the relevant cases, and were delivered directly to the purchasers. Those findings were not shown to be perverse. The Tribunal also relied on the settled principle that such factual findings do not, by themselves, raise a question of law when supported by evidence.
Conclusion: The transactions were rightly treated as inter-State sales, and the reference was correctly answered against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A sale is an inter-State sale where the movement of goods from one State to another is the direct result of, or an incident of, the contract of sale, and supported findings of fact on that question do not ordinarily give rise to a question of law.