Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1995 (11) TMI 411

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g that a transaction of Rs. 1,91,301 in respect of despatches made to the buyers of Banswada, Kota, Bhimani Mandi, Nimbaheda and Pratapgarh and constituted inter-State sales as the goods were directly despatched to buyers at these places by the headquarter? (b) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Board of Revenue was justified in holding that a transaction of Rs. 63,000 constituted sales having been made in the course of inter-State trade or commerce when the goods were despatched to various buyers of Chittorgarh where the assessee's depot is located and the goods were not unloaded at the depot and the goods were directly delivered to the buyers? 2.. Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Board o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../82 and 79-PBR/82 before the Tribunal. The appeals were only allowed in part so far as the quantum of turnover was concerned by order dated August 27, 1983 (annexures "C/1" and C/2"). Thereafter the assessee filed the Reference Application No. 123-PBR/83 (annexure "D/1") and Reference Application No. 124-PBR/83 (annexure "D/2") under section 44(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 read with section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 seeking reference of the case to this Court. On these applications, the Tribunal stated the case and referred the aforesaid questions of law for decision. 3.. We have heard Shri G.M. Chaphekar, learned Senior Counsel with Shri S.S. Samvatsar, for the applicant/assessee and Shri K.K. Gupta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted in [1976] 38 STC 475 (English Electric Company of India Ltd. v. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer). 6.. This finding of fact, not shown to be perverse or perishable, reached by the Tribunal did not give, as held in [1976] 103 ITR 543 (SC) [Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Calcutta v. Ashoka Marketing Ltd.] and in [1971] 79 ITR 499 (SC) (Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh v. Kotrika Venkataswamy and Sons) any rise to the question of law and as such the Tribunal rightly rejected the reference application.   7.. In Marbury v. Madison 1-Crauch 137 (1803), it was observed that  "Affirmative words are often, in their operations, negative of other objects than those affirmed, and in this case, a negative or exclusiv....