Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether an appeal under section 10 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 lay before the Sales Tax Tribunal against an order passed by the first appellate authority under section 22 of that Act.
Analysis: Section 9 provides the first appeal against an order of the assessing authority, while section 10 provides the second appeal to the Tribunal against an order passed by the appellate authority under section 9. The rectification order under section 22, though passed separately, was held to be in substance an order passed in the appeal itself because it merely corrected the appellate order. The legislative scheme was read as not excluding such an appeal, and the earlier amendment to section 11 was treated as confirmatory. The Court followed the view that the Tribunal could entertain appeals against such rectification orders.
Conclusion: An appeal lay before the Sales Tax Tribunal against the section 22 rectification order passed by the first appellate authority.
Final Conclusion: The revisions failed because the Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the departmental appeals arising from the rectification orders, and the impugned order was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: A rectification order passed by the first appellate authority under section 22 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 is an order in the appeal itself and is appealable to the Tribunal under section 10.