Legislative competence limits on compulsory acquisition of industrial undertakings: acquisition power required express authority and could not be implied.

A law providing for compulsory acquisition of an electrical undertaking was held to be, in substance, an acquisition statute and not a law regulating electricity or corporations. Under the Government of India Act, 1935, no legislative entry authorised the compulsory acquisition of a commercial or industrial undertaking, and such power could not be implied as incidental to another subject. Section 299(2) dealt with compulsory acquisition only for public purposes subject to compensation, while section 104 showed that residual authority required a Governor-General's notification. The Madras Legislature therefore lacked competence to enact the impugned measure, and the statute was invalid.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Madras Legislature had legislative competence to enact a law providing for the compulsory acquisition of an electrical undertaking.

Analysis: The Act, viewed from its long title, preamble and operative provisions, was held to be in substance a law for the acquisition of electrical undertakings and not a law regulating electricity or corporations. Under the Seventh Schedule to the Government of India Act, 1935, no entry conferred power on either Legislature to enact a law for compulsory acquisition of a commercial or industrial undertaking. Section 299(2) contemplated compulsory acquisition for public purposes only subject to compensation, and section 104 showed that legislative authority over matters not enumerated in the lists could be conferred only by the Governor-General's notification. The existence of specific power for compulsory acquisition of land, and the absence of any corresponding entry for industrial undertakings, negatived any implied general power of acquisition.

Conclusion: The impugned Act was beyond the legislative competence of the Madras Legislature and was invalid.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded because the acquisition statute could not be sustained within the legislative fields assigned by the Government of India Act, 1935.

Ratio Decidendi: Compulsory acquisition of a commercial or industrial undertaking could be authorised only by an express legislative entry or by authority conferred under section 104 of the Government of India Act, 1935; it could not be implied as incidental to another legislative subject.

---