Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to waiver of the eligibility requirement under section 244(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 so as to maintain a petition under sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Analysis: The applicants did not satisfy the statutory threshold of holding not less than one-tenth of the issued share capital. The Tribunal considered the statutory text of section 244, the meaning of issued share capital, and the authorities relied upon on waiver. It held that waiver is discretionary and is granted only in exceptional circumstances. On the material placed, the applicants had not made out such exceptional circumstances. The Tribunal also noted that the views on the underlying oppression and mismanagement allegations were only for examining waiver and did not decide the merits of the proposed company petition.
Conclusion: The prayer for waiver under section 244(1)(a) was rejected and the application was not maintainable.