Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional authority could interfere with the assessment and grant relief in the absence of material showing illegality or impropriety in the assessment order, and whether it could substitute its own judgment for that of the assessing authority.
Analysis: The revisional power under the sales tax law is attracted only where the order sought to be revised suffers from illegality or impropriety. On the record, no material had been placed before the assessing authority to support the claim that the disputed receipts arose from works contracts or to justify reduction of the profit rate. In such circumstances, the revisional authority was not justified in disturbing the assessment merely on a different view of the facts, nor could it replace the assessing authority's conclusion with its own in the absence of relevant material.
Conclusion: The revisional authority had no basis to interfere, and its order setting aside the assessment relief was upheld. The appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Revisional interference is permissible only when the original order is shown to suffer from illegality or impropriety, and the revisional authority cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the assessing authority without supporting material.