Time-barred composition applications under agricultural income-tax law upheld, with belated compounding requests rejected.

Section 65 of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act permits composition only if the application is made in the prescribed form within the prescribed time. Rule 31 required the application to reach the Assessing Officer on or before 15 June of the relevant year, subject only to a limited 90-day condonation on sufficient cause. As the composition applications were filed long after that limit, they were time-barred. The annual scheme of agricultural income-tax also excluded composition for broken periods. The revisional order setting aside the compounding assessments and directing fresh orders was therefore upheld as legally sustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the revisional order setting aside the compounding assessments and directing fresh orders was sustainable in law, particularly when the applications for composition were filed long after the time prescribed under the Rules.

Analysis: Section 65 of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955 permits composition of agricultural income-tax, but sub-section (4) requires the application to be made in the prescribed form and within the prescribed time. Rule 31 of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Rules, 1955 requires the application to reach the Assessing Officer on or before 15 June of the relevant year, with only a limited condonation window of 90 days on sufficient cause being shown. The applications in question were filed on 14 June 1982 for the accounting year 1 April 1981 to 31 March 1982, far beyond the prescribed time. The Act also contemplates annual taxation, and composition is not available for broken periods.

Conclusion: The revisional order was valid, since the applications for composition were time-barred and the assessments could not lawfully be sustained on the basis of those belated applications.

---