Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 barred coercive recovery steps, including garnishee orders and threat of recovery as arrears of land revenue, for sales tax dues against a sick industrial company.
Analysis: A reference had been made under section 15(1) of the Act and the Board had declared the company sick under section 3(1)(o), while a rehabilitation scheme was under preparation or consideration under section 17. In that situation, section 22(1) operates to suspend proceedings for execution, distress or the like against the properties of the industrial company except with the consent of the Board. Mere raising of a demand is not prohibited, but notices warning coercive recovery and garnishee orders directing banks not to pay amounts to the company and to credit them towards sales tax dues are recovery measures falling within the statutory embargo.
Conclusion: The coercive recovery action was barred by section 22(1) and could not proceed without the Board's consent.