Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether recovery proceedings for sales tax could be stayed under section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 when no enquiry under section 16, no scheme under section 17, and no appeal under section 25 was pending.
Analysis: Section 22(1) operates only where the statutory preconditions are satisfied, namely pendency of an enquiry, preparation or consideration of a scheme, or a pending appeal under the Act. The proceeding in question was for realisation of sales tax dues, and the Tribunal found that none of the conditions attracting the automatic suspension under section 22(1) existed on the facts. The cited decisions were distinguished on the footing that, in appropriate cases, the proper course is to seek the Board's consent rather than stop recovery proceedings altogether.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to stay of the recovery proceedings under section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985.