Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        VAT and Sales Tax

        1990 (7) TMI 341 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Statutory tax-clarification power under section 59-A is adjudicatory only, binds parties alone, and cannot operate retrospectively. Section 59-A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 was construed as a statutory adjudicatory power to decide a referred question on the rate of tax ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Statutory tax-clarification power under section 59-A is adjudicatory only, binds parties alone, and cannot operate retrospectively.

                            Section 59-A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 was construed as a statutory adjudicatory power to decide a referred question on the rate of tax after hearing both sides, not as a source of unilateral executive instruction or delegated legislation. The Government's decision under that provision binds only the parties to the reference for the relevant assessment year, while quasi-judicial authorities remain bound to interpret the Act and Rules independently. The provision was also held not to authorise retrospective clarification or decision that increases an assessee's tax burden; any such effect is confined to prospective operation. On that construction, the original assessment was restored.




                            Issues: (i) the scope of the Government's power under section 59-A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; (ii) whether quasi-judicial authorities under the Act are bound by the Government's clarification or decision under section 59-A; and (iii) whether a decision under section 59-A can operate retrospectively so as to increase the tax burden of an assessee.

                            Issue (i): What is the scope of the Government's power under section 59-A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963?

                            Analysis: Section 59-A was construed in the setting of the Act as a provision for decision on a referred question concerning the rate of tax, not as a source of unilateral executive instructions or delegated legislation. The power was held to require a lis between the assessee and the assessing authority, and the Government was treated as exercising a statutory adjudicatory function. The decision must be taken after hearing both sides and on the basis of materials placed before it, with any wider legislative change left to the rule-making or amending powers under the Act.

                            Conclusion: The power under section 59-A is a statutory adjudicatory power to decide a referred question on rate of tax after hearing both parties, and it cannot be exercised unilaterally.

                            Issue (ii): Whether quasi-judicial authorities under the Act are bound by the Government's clarification or decision under section 59-A?

                            Analysis: The decision under section 59-A was held to bind only the parties to the dispute and only for the assessment year concerned. The Tribunal and other quasi-judicial authorities under the Act remain bound by their own duty to interpret the statute and the Rules. The Government's decision was not treated as a general command binding all authorities or as a substitute for independent quasi-judicial adjudication by the Tribunal.

                            Conclusion: Quasi-judicial authorities under the Act are not bound by the Government's clarification or decision under section 59-A.

                            Issue (iii): Whether a decision under section 59-A can operate retrospectively so as to increase the tax burden of an assessee?

                            Analysis: The Court held that section 59-A does not authorise the Government to issue clarifications or decisions having retrospective effect when they adversely affect an assessee or enhance the tax burden. Any such decision was confined to prospective operation. Applying that construction, tarpaulin was not taxable at 10 per cent under entry 100 of the First Schedule for the relevant assessment year, and the original assessment treating it otherwise was restored.

                            Conclusion: A decision under section 59-A cannot be given retrospective effect to increase the tax burden of an assessee.

                            Final Conclusion: The revision succeeded, the Tribunal's order was set aside, and the original assessment was restored on the footing that the Government's decision under section 59-A could not override independent quasi-judicial determination or operate retrospectively against the assessee.

                            Ratio Decidendi: A statutory power to decide a referred question on tax rate must be exercised as quasi-judicial adjudication, binds only the parties to the reference for the relevant assessment year, and cannot be used to impose retrospective fiscal liability.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found