TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 59A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, which empowered the Government to decide questions relating to the rate of tax and made its decision final, was constitutionally valid under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The Act already contained a detailed scheme for assessment, appeal and revision, including provisions for hearing the dealer and for scrutiny by quasi-judicial and judicial authorities. Section 59A, by contrast, authorised an administrative determination of the rate of tax without indicating who could make a reference, without requiring notice or hearing to the affected dealer, and with a finality clause overriding the ordinary appellate and revisional framework. The provision contained no guidelines as to the stage or manner of exercise of the power and allowed the Government to substitute executive decision for quasi-judicial adjudication. The existence of safeguards in analogous legislation, such as section 49 of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975, highlighted the absence of limiting standards in section 59A.
Conclusion: Section 59A was held to confer uncanalised and arbitrary power and was struck down as violative of Article 14. The challenge failed and the appeals were dismissed against the appellant State.
Final Conclusion: The statutory provision enabling the Government to conclusively determine tax-rate questions without safeguards or appellate control was invalid, and the impugned judgment was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A provision that gives the executive an unrestricted and final power to determine tax liability questions, while displacing the normal adjudicatory process and providing no guiding standards or hearing safeguards, is arbitrary and unconstitutional under Article 14.
TaxTMI 
