Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether recovery of sales tax arrears from the petitioner's salary under section 25 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 had to be confined to the extent protected from attachment under section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Analysis: The recovery direction was understood as intended to operate only to the extent of a reasonable monthly deduction and not so as to deprive the employee of his entire salary. The Court accepted the principle reflected in the proviso to section 226(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, namely that salary exempt from attachment in execution of a civil decree remains protected from requisition for tax recovery. On that basis, section 25 was applied so that recovery from salary would remain within the limits recognised by section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Conclusion: Recovery from the petitioner's salary was confined to the extent permissible under section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the petitioner succeeded.