Confiscation of used pipes upheld under foreign trade policy, but redemption fine and penalty were reduced as excessive.

Imported used pipes were examined under the Foreign Trade Policy, and confiscation was upheld because the goods were brought in without the required licence and did not fall within the relied-upon policy permission for free import of second-hand capital goods, refurbished or reconditioned spares. The enhanced valuation was not challenged, so it remained undisturbed. However, because the pipes had been used by the importer for drilling, the redemption fine and penalty were found excessive and were reduced. The decision therefore sustained confiscation and the enhanced value, while granting relief only on the monetary consequences.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether confiscation of the imported used pipes was warranted under the Foreign Trade Policy; (ii) whether the enhanced value and the consequential fine and penalty required interference.

Issue (i): Whether confiscation of the imported used pipes was warranted under the Foreign Trade Policy.

Analysis: The goods were imported as used pipes without a licence. The policy provision relied on permitted free import of second hand capital goods, including refurbished or reconditioned spares, and the Tribunal held that the import did not fall outside the policy bar in the manner urged by the appellant. The challenge to confiscation therefore did not succeed.

Conclusion: Confiscation was upheld and the appellant was not entitled to relief on this issue.

Issue (ii): Whether the enhanced value and the consequential fine and penalty required interference.

Analysis: The challenge to the enhanced valuation was not pressed. However, considering that the goods had been used by the appellant for drilling, the Tribunal found that the quantum of redemption fine and penalty was excessive and warranted reduction, while leaving the enhanced value undisturbed.

Conclusion: The enhanced value was upheld, but the redemption fine and penalty were reduced.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in part, with confiscation maintained but the monetary consequences reduced.

---