Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notice issued under section 10(6) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act could demand tax over and above the amount shown as due in the return before the assessment was finalised.
Analysis: The return filed by the petitioner had not yet been adjudicated upon and the assessment had not been completed. Until such adjudication, the dealer remained bound only to pay tax in accordance with the return, while the Assessing Authority could, in law, scrutinise the deductions claimed and determine any additional liability only after deciding the return on merits. In the absence of such adjudication, a further demand beyond the tax admitted in the return was not permissible under the provision invoked.
Conclusion: The notice demanding additional tax before finalisation of assessment was invalid and was quashed.