Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dealer satisfied the condition under the exemption notification that the goods should be used within the State, when a limited part of the manufacturing process, namely die-casting, was carried out outside Rajasthan and the goods were then brought back for completion of manufacture within the State.
Analysis: The exemption was denied by the assessing authority on the ground that the statutory condition of use within the State was not met. The Board of Revenue took the view that the limited out-of-State movement was only for an incidental stage in the manufacture of ornaments, because the necessary facility was unavailable within Rajasthan, and the goods were returned for ultimate use in the State. The decisive consideration was that the goods were sent only for completing an intermediate manufacturing step and were ultimately used within Rajasthan; such a temporary removal did not negate satisfaction of the notification condition.
Conclusion: The condition of use within the State was satisfied. The assessee was entitled to the exemption, and the revision failed.
Final Conclusion: The departmental challenge to the exemption was rejected, and the Board of Revenue's view granting relief to the dealer stood confirmed.
Ratio Decidendi: Temporary dispatch of goods outside the State for an incidental and unavoidable stage of manufacture, followed by their return for ultimate use within the State, does not defeat a notification condition requiring use within the State.