Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption on second sales of aluminium electrical wires merely because the purchaser was a manufacturer using the goods for a different purpose.
Analysis: The assessee had effected a second sale of electrical goods falling within the single point scheme under item 41 of the First Schedule. The rejection of exemption by the revisional authority rested only on the fact that the purchaser was a manufacturer of aluminium utensils and not an electrical dealer. The Court held that entitlement to second sale exemption depends on the character of the sale as a second sale of goods already subjected to tax, and not on the identity or use of the purchaser. Once the goods sold are electrical goods and the sale is a second sale, the exemption cannot be denied on the ground that the purchaser put them to another use.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to exemption on the second sales, and the revisional order denying that benefit was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Second sale exemption cannot be denied merely because the purchaser is not a dealer in the same goods or uses the goods for a different purpose, where the sale is otherwise a second sale of taxable goods.