Customs Commissioner Orders Confiscation of Imported Car, Tribunal Reverses Decision

The Commissioner of Customs ordered absolute confiscation of a Hummer H2 car imported from Thailand due to violations of licensing notes. The importer, a machine operator, admitted the violations but argued against confiscation based on financial status. The Tribunal found the confiscation unwarranted, allowing confiscation with redemption options and a reassessment of fines. The appeal was successful, overturning the absolute confiscation order.

---

---

Issues:
Violation of Licensing Note 2(II)(a)(iv) to Chapter 87 of the ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import by importing a new vehicle from a country other than the manufacturer.
Non-compliance with the conditions stipulated in Licensing Note 2(ii)(C) regarding testing and certification of new vehicles at the time of importation.
Questioning the financial status of the importer as a basis for absolute confiscation.

Analysis:
The Commissioner of Customs ordered absolute confiscation of a brand new Hummer H2 motor car imported by the appellant under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 due to violations of Licensing Note 2(II)(a)(iv) and non-compliance with Licensing Note 2(ii)(C). The car was imported from Thailand instead of the USA, where it was manufactured, and the importer failed to produce the required Type Approval Certificate. The confiscation was also based on the assumption that the appellant, a machine operator in Sharjah, could not afford such an expensive vehicle and merely lent his name for importation.

During the hearing, the importer acknowledged the violations but requested the release of the car upon payment of a fine, arguing that the importer's financial status should not be a determining factor. The opposing view highlighted concerns about potential illicit activities like Hawala transactions and money laundering involving importers used as fronts for vehicle importation.

The Tribunal considered the absence of any requirement in the Import Policy regarding the importer's financial capacity and concluded that absolute confiscation was unwarranted. The order was modified to allow confiscation with an option for redemption of the vehicle. The Tribunal directed the re-determination of the fine and penalty within three months, providing the importer with a fair opportunity to present their case.

Ultimately, the appeal was allowed, and the order of absolute confiscation was overturned in favor of a confiscation order with redemption options, subject to a reassessment of fines and penalties by the adjudicating authority.

---