Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a dealer who carried on business only for part of the year could claim the benefit of the exemption notification, if the other prescribed conditions were satisfied.
Analysis: The exemption was intended to assist small dealers dealing exclusively in second-hand gunny bags and hessian. A construction that confined the benefit only to a dealer who carried on business for the entire twelve months would defeat that purpose. The word "year" in the notification was therefore read in its general sense as the assessment year during which the dealer actually carried on business. The declaration appended to the notification also supported the view that the decisive test was whether the turnover during the relevant year of business exceeded the prescribed limit. There was no basis to enhance the actual turnover on a pro rata assumption for a notional full year.
Conclusion: The dealer who carried on business only for part of the year was entitled to the benefit of the notification, provided the remaining conditions were fulfilled.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification intended for small dealers must be construed to give effect to its object, and the expression "turnover in a year" may apply to the actual assessment year of business even where the dealer trades for only part of that year.