1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal orders refund of duty with interest, stresses timely implementation of legal orders</h1> The Tribunal rejected Revenue's appeals and directed the Department to implement the lower appellate authority's order granting the respondents a refund ... - Issues:1. Appeal against grant of refund2. Departmental inaction on implementing tribunal's order3. Claim for interest on refunded amounts4. Delay in decision by Customs authoritiesAnalysis:1. The Tribunal rejected Revenue's appeals against the grant of refund to the respondents by the lower appellate authority. The Department became liable to implement the lower appellate authority's order, entitling the respondents to a refund of duty with interest if due. Due to Departmental inaction, the respondents sought direction from the Tribunal for implementation. The Tribunal directed the Department to comply with the order within four weeks. Despite requests from both parties, there was no action by the Department, leading to the filing of applications.2. The Deputy Commissioner of Customs was required to explain the inaction in implementing the Tribunal's order. The Assistant Commissioner admitted the inaction and apologized. The Assistant Commissioner requested a two-month period to dispose of the respondents' claim for interest. After hearing the consultant for the respondents, the Tribunal granted the Assistant Commissioner's request, directing the disposal of the claim within two months, ensuring both parties have a reasonable opportunity to be heard on the interest payment.3. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of implementing the lower appellate authority's orders. The Assistant Commissioner was directed to expedite the decision on the interest claim, ensuring a fair hearing for both parties. The Tribunal acknowledged the delay caused by the Department's inaction and aimed to resolve the matter promptly.4. The applications were disposed of based on the Assistant Commissioner's commitment to addressing the respondents' claim for interest within the specified period. The Tribunal's decision aimed to ensure timely resolution of the issue and uphold the principles of justice and compliance with legal orders.Judgment Summary:The Tribunal rejected Revenue's appeals, directing the Department to implement the lower appellate authority's order granting the respondents a refund of duty with interest. Due to Departmental inaction, the Tribunal intervened, directing the Assistant Commissioner to dispose of the interest claim within two months, ensuring a fair hearing for both parties. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely implementation of legal orders and resolved the matter to uphold justice and compliance.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
