Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of the confirmed demand relating to the period beyond one year from the show cause notice on the ground that invocation of the extended period of limitation was not sustainable.
Analysis: The demand for the relevant balance amount pertained to the period beyond one year from the date of the show cause notice. The product description had been disclosed to the Department from the stage of registration, and the registration certificate itself reflected the classification claimed by the appellant. On that basis, the Department was found to have been aware of the appellant's stand regarding classification, and the allegation of suppression did not, at least prima facie, support invocation of the extended period of limitation. The classification issue under Heading 8433.00 was therefore treated as a substantial ground against immediate recovery of the balance demand.
Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to waiver of the remaining pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal.