Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dealer was liable to tax on the turnover of goods received back from another State and resold in Uttar Pradesh on the footing that he was not an importer.
Analysis: The assessee had first purchased the goods on behalf of an ex-U.P. principal and despatched them to Jaipur, after which the transaction became final. When the goods were returned and subsequently resold in U.P., the assessee had imported the goods within the meaning relevant to the levy. Vegetable oil was taxable at a single point, namely at manufacture or import under the applicable notification, and there was no evidence that tax had already been paid at the point of manufacture or by the original seller. On those facts, the resale turnover could not escape assessment in the assessee's hands.
Conclusion: The assessee was correctly treated as an importer and the turnover was liable to tax in his hands.