Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods cleared for transport without any accompanying document, on the plea that the unit was exempt from registration and from following the AR-4/AR-4A procedure, were liable to confiscation along with the vehicle used for transport, and whether the redemption fine and penalty were justified.
Analysis: Exemption from registration and from the AR-4/AR-4A procedure did not amount to a blanket dispensation from maintaining production and clearance records or from issuing transport documents. The exemption was conditional, and absence of documents would defeat regulatory monitoring of whether clearances remained within the permitted limit. Goods transported without any document were therefore liable to confiscation, and the vehicle used for such transport was also liable to confiscation. The redemption fine and penalty imposed were found to be nominal and not excessive.
Conclusion: The confiscation of the goods and the vehicle, together with the redemption fine and penalty, was upheld.