Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported second-hand beams for wrap knitting machines were capital goods freely importable under the Foreign Trade Policy and, if so, whether confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were sustainable.
Analysis: Paragraph 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy permits free import of second-hand capital goods, and paragraph 9.12 defines capital goods broadly to include plant, machinery, equipment and accessories required for manufacture or production. The goods were found to be separate equipment used for supplying yarn in the knitting process and not merely restricted spares. On that basis, they fell within the definition of capital goods and did not attract the restriction applied by the adjudicating authority.
Conclusion: The import was not in violation of the Customs law or the Foreign Trade Policy, and the confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were unsustainable. The appeal was allowed.