Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order under section 16 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act was vitiated for denial of a real and adequate opportunity to inspect the seized slips and diaries and to submit objections before assessment.
Analysis: The assessment was founded on incriminating material seized from the assessee's premises and residence. After remand by the appellate authority, the assessee sought time to re-inspect the slips and diaries before filing objections, because the proposal notice made it clear that the material would again be used against him. The request was refused. In such circumstances, mere reference to extracts in the proposal notice was not enough to satisfy the requirement of a fair opportunity. Where the authority relies on seized material to make the assessment, the assessee must be given a real chance to examine that material and answer it before the final order is passed.
Conclusion: The assessment order was vitiated by violation of the principles of natural justice and was liable to be quashed. The assessee was entitled to a fresh opportunity before the assessing authority proceeded further.
Ratio Decidendi: When assessment is based on seized incriminating material, refusal to give the assessee a meaningful opportunity to inspect that material and respond to it before finalisation of the assessment amounts to breach of natural justice.