Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether poultry feed prepared from broken wheat with other ingredients was exempt from sales tax as wheat or as a tax-free item under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948.
Analysis: The claim for exemption was rejected because the material on record showed that the poultry feed was not merely broken wheat. The assessing authority found that wheat formed only a small part of the finished product and that other ingredients were used to create a separate manufactured commodity. The court held that exemption granted to foodgrains did not extend to products manufactured from them unless the product itself was specifically exempt. The later insertion of item 71 in Schedule B, declaring poultry feed tax-free, also indicated that poultry feed was treated as a distinct item and not as wheat or foodgrain.
Conclusion: Poultry feed was held to be a commodity distinct from wheat and was not exempt from sales tax under the existing exemption provisions.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition failed because the petitioner could not establish that the sold commodity fell within the tax-free entries applicable to wheat or foodgrains.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption for a raw material does not automatically extend to a manufactured product made from that material unless the product itself is specifically brought within the exemption entry.