Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under section 7(4) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, the Commissioner could cancel a registration certificate on a ground outside section 7(6) or on information other than that contemplated by section 16.
Analysis: The expression "otherwise received" in section 7(4) was held to qualify the word "information" and not to enlarge the power to cover information outside the statutory scheme of section 16. The provision was read as referring to information which the dealer was bound to furnish under section 16, or the same information received from another source if the dealer failed to supply it. The language of the subsection was found clear and incapable of being expanded to justify cancellation on a different ground. The challenge based on alleged fraudulent sales could not override the plain wording of the statute. The concession regarding lack of adequate opportunity was not open for reconsideration in the appeal.
Conclusion: The cancellation order was without authority under section 7(4) and was rightly quashed. The appeal was decided against the appellant and in favour of the assessee.