Decorative printing and etching on plain glassware as "manufacture" for s.80-I tax deduction; relief upheld for assessee

Deduction under s. 80-I of the Income-tax Act turned on whether decorative printing/etching on plain glassware constitutes "manufacture or production" of an article or thing. Applying SC authority that "manufacture" is to be construed widely and includes processes such as printing, the HC held that manufacture involves transformation resulting in a new and different article with distinct character and use. Since the process irreversibly converted plain glassware into decorative glassware marketed as a different commodity, a distinct end-product emerged. The Tribunal's view was affirmed and the assessee was held entitled to s. 80-I relief; the question of law was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The judgment involves the interpretation of eligibility for relief under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act for activities involving decorative printing on glassware, specifically determining whether such activities constitute manufacturing or production of an article or thing.

Eligibility for Relief u/s 80-I:
The respondent-assessee, a company engaged in decorative printing of glassware, claimed deduction under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1987-88. The Assessing Officer initially accepted the claim, considering the printing of glassware as manufacturing or production. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax, u/s 263 of the Act, reversed this decision, stating that the printing did not involve any manufacturing process. The Tribunal, on appeal, disagreed with the Commissioner, holding that decorating plain glass amounted to manufacturing an article or thing, thus entitling the assessee to the deduction under section 80-I.

Processing Involved in Production:
The assessee presented details of the processing involved in producing the end-product before the Tribunal. The process included cleaning the glassware, decorating with prints using screen printing machines, and annealing the articles in a chamber at high temperatures to fuse the design into the glass permanently. The Supreme Court's precedent in Empire Industries Ltd. v. Union of India highlighted that manufacturing encompasses processes like printing, emphasizing that a transformation resulting in a distinct and different article is essential.

Court's Decision:
The High Court concurred with the Tribunal's finding that the decorative printing on plain glass constituted manufacturing or production of a distinct article, different from plain glassware. The irreversible transformation of the glassware into decorative glassware, marketed as a separate commodity, indicated a change in character and use, aligning with the broad interpretation of "manufacture" as per legal precedents. Consequently, the assessee was deemed eligible for the benefit of section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, and the question of law was answered in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.

---